Contact an Attorney

Precedential 3rd Circuit Ruling Clarifies Authority to Review Remand Orders

Promotional poster. Heading: Epstein Ostrove, as quoted by Read Article. Portrait of Elliot Ostrove, an NJ lawyer.

A recent NJ LAW JOURNAL article discussed the precedential ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in a matter in which Epstein Ostrove represented certain of the Defendants who reside in Germany.  Our Partner, Elliot Ostrove, was quoted in the article.  Counsel, Vahbiz Karanjia and Associate Jordan Cohen worked on the briefing that was filed with the Court.

“We are pleased that the court agreed with us, finding that our appeal should be heard,” said Elliot D. Ostrove of Epstein Ostrove, counsel to the appellants. “The decision brings some further clarity on the difference between a remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(d), an exercise of discretion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367, and appellate jurisdiction in connection with [the] same.” Vahbiz P. Karanjia of Epstein Ostrove also worked on the case.

Read the full article.

Book A Consultation

Fill out our quick form and our team will get in touch with you for a consultation.